I gaze at The scientific account of the Origin of man in cold shiver because I know it is positive and it is even literally revealed in the birth and growth of man. Lets say The belly of a woman is the seas and the child in it is the 'unicellular organism' that began the journey of the human evolution. The child is born and it depends on both mum's bosom and the "outside" (life became an amphibian). The child starts to crawl (four legged animals and dinasors). The child starts standing upright (apes). Most Children become addicted to turning the whole house upside down when they start crawling, this figuratively shows how rugged and destructive the dinasors may have been. High five to science! U are a genius.
Who ever initiated this idea is beyond human, but this does not mean that the biblical account is wrong. The scientific account literally explains the origin of man and the biblical account figuratively explains the beginning. Both accounts are supposed to be interwoven, but the problem is that both accounts hate to associate with each other. The scientific account hates to acknowledge belief and the biblical account embraces belief and invisibility and hates to be submissive to pure reasoning. But the fact is that no faith can work completely without the intervention understanding (reasoning)
Comments
Post a Comment